What law do you want to teach?

Written by Hazel Weiser

Attorney General Eric Holder at May 7 White House briefing on judicial vacancies

Felix Frankfurter could never be confirmed as a Supreme Court justice in today’s America.  He was a prolific scholar, leaving a trail of law review articles and books that even his contemporaries at Harvard Law School branded as radical.  He was a principled activist.  He organized an investigation into the notorious Palmer raids, orchestrated by a young ambitious J. Edgar Hoover.  Frankfurter and a small group of colleagues published “Report to the American People,” May 28, 1920, in which they accused then Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer and Hoover of an “assault upon the most sacred principles of our Constitutional liberties.”  Weiner, Tim (2012). Enemies: A History of the FBI. Random House, Inc.  (The Palmer raids accurately foreshadowed the American response to 911.)

The Palmer raids rounded up thousands of mostly immigrants who were suspected of being Communists and anarchists.  No one knows for sure how many people were pulled off the streets, out of their homes, and away from their families.  Those men and women were beaten, tortured, and held incommunicado.  Over five thousand men and women is the estimate.  Those who were born abroad were summarily deported after only cursory hearings.  All of the detainees, most of whom were rounded up without warrants, were denied access to lawyers.

Professor Frankfurter challenged the power of the Attorney General of the United States and his emerging bully, J. Edgar, in court proceedings held in Boston.  Hoover arrived but never came into the courtroom after Palmer was humiliated during questioning.  Instead Hoover quietly fled back to D.C. and later denied that he had indeed run every aspect of the Palmer Raids.

More activism, more commitment to social justice and the fair administration of the law.  Frankfurter, after reviewing the trial transcript, defended Sacco and Vanzetti in an impassioned essay in the Atlantic Monthly.  The prosecution and judge, accused Frankfurter, had played on anti-immigrant sentiments within the jury, and the case violated “all…notions of Anglo-American procedure.”  Then Harvard President A. Lawrence Lowell was appointed by the Massachusetts governor to review the conviction, and found that there was no viable claim of misfeasance nor should there be clemency.  Here’s where academic freedom is essential: Frankfurter remained on the Harvard Law faculty from 1914 through 1939, when he was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Imagine what his confirmation hearings might look like today!  (Think Goodwin Liu for the Ninth Circuit or Dawn Johnsen for Director of Office of Legal Counsel.)

Every president is entitled, under the constitution, to a very specific legacy.  The power of the president to nominate qualified candidates to the federal judiciary for life, subject, of course, to the advise and consent of the Senate, is one of the most important presidential powers written into the Constitution.  Yes, originalists, written into the Constitution from the very beginning!  The judicial appointments process has bogged down in politics.  Depending on which political party is telling the history, the blame for escalating obstruction gets bandied back and forth.  It seems more prominent, or at least, more effective, during Democratic administrations.

Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Pedagogy, Social Justice | Leave a comment

Stepping out of Line (Redux): Refluat Stercus or an Essay in parts on the KSM and other Military Commissions, Torture, Habeas and Detention, Targeting with Drones, False Pretenses for the War in Iraq and other aspects of the current conflict and accountability

Benjamin G. Davis, Associate Professor of Law, University of Toledo College of Law

I am moved to write about several aspects of the current conflict in this space as part of what I perceive as my duty as a professor of international law and an American citizen living and working in Toledo, Ohio.  What I have to write may take some time and be over several posts, but I will endeavour to give the same name and give the different aspects of these posts.  I would be happy if people would feel free to link to these articles if they find them of interest.

I. Military Commissions Generally

With the arraignment this morning of KSM and the other alleged 9/11 plotters, the next act of the military commission endgame plays out with the whole world watching. We are asked to watch and see the quality of the system and judge for ourselves (Brig Gen Mark Martins Remarks May 4, 2012 http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/05/live-blogging-tomorrows-arraignment-in-united-states-v-ksm-et-al/#more-7092).  There are those who have watched past proceedings who assure us they were fair (Benjamin Wittes, Will Military Commissions Survive KSM? The Washington Post, May 4, 2012, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ksm-trial-will-put-military-commissions-to-the-test/2012/05/03/gIQAXeE0zT_story.html) and there are those who have worked in them who  challenge their fairness (Morris Davis, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Gets His Way, Salon, May 2, 2012, http://www.salon.com/writer/morris_davis/).

 Is it true that  ”Quietly and gradually, the commissions have become a real court?”

Continue reading

Posted in Unspecified | Leave a comment

Overlooking (even seemingly high profile) rural crimes

Americans are often said to have a love-hate relationship with rural America.  On the one hand, many wax nostalgic about the good old days, simpler times, the bond of “rural community” that many of our grandparents once lived, even if most of “us” grew up in the city.  Plus, most everyone enjoys a bit of time spent in “nature,” and some even realize–the urban ag craze aside–that most of our food is grown “in the country.”  On the other hand, urbanites often hold rural people in disdain, mocking them for their attachment to place, their regressive politics and culture and, yes, even for their nostalgia.

One particular aspect of the “love” (more precisely, nostalgia) with which we may regard rural America is the tendency to think that bad things associated with cities–most notably crime–are largely absent in smaller towns, in nonmetropolitan areas.  That’s hardly accurate, as I’ve discussed here and here.  I wonder, though, if these rural myths are the reason that even more shocking crimes–crimes involving, for example, racial or ethnic animus–don’t get national attention.  For crimes like these, I would think that urban Americans might be anxious to publicize the crimes, to hold these acts up as justification for the “hate” (that is, disdain, contempt) part of the relationship. Continue reading

Posted in Unspecified | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

When Just Right is Unjust: Goldilocks Jurisprudence and the Right to Counsel in Post-Conviction Appeals

By Hugh Mundy

During its October 2011 term, the Supreme Court issued two well-publicized decisions severely curtailing the already tenuous Fourth Amendment rights of the accused and incarcerated.  First, in Howes v. Fields, the Court held that prisoner interrogations held “in private” about “events occurring outside the prison” do not require Miranda warnings.  In addition, in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, the Court sanctioned jailhouse strip searches of arrestees without reasonable – or any – suspicion of criminal activity.  Even as the Court further eviscerated the Fourth Amendment rights of those in custody, two other rulings, Maples v. Thomas and Martinez v. Ryan, extended the Sixth Amendment right to counsel for incarcerated litigants.  Still, unlike the obvious damage to prisoner’s rights wrought by the Fourth Amendment cases, the utility of the Maples and Martinez for inmates seems murky at best.

In Maples, the Court held that a death row inmate established good cause to excuse his failure to move for post-conviction relief after his lawyers missed a filing deadline in state court. While the case made headlines as Maples’ pro bono attorneys hailed from the prestigious New York firm of Sullivan & Cromwell, its precedential value appears limited.  Indeed, in determining that Maples demonstrated good cause for his delinquency, the Court narrowly tailored its ruling to the unique case facts surrounding the botched appeal.  Those “unusual and extraordinary circumstances” included a “mail room mix-up” at Sullivan & Cromwell, a failure by Maples’ local counsel to file a notice of appeal, and an admission by Maples’ trial attorneys that they “were stumbling around in the dark” during the sentencing phase of his trial.  In a concurring opinion, Justice Alito noted that Maples was entitled to relief due to the “perfect storm of misfortune” that engulfed his appeal.

Martinez, by contrast, received comparably little media attention.  The case may have been overlooked because it deals, in large part, with complicated state procedural rules governing access to federal habeas corpus review.  As a result, the opinion is not easily reduced to sound-bites or headlines.  Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice | Leave a comment

John Payton’s Legacy: An Antidote to Cynicism

Written by Hazel Weiser

John Payton

John Payton, former President and Director-Counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund

This morning NPR broadcast a report on the millionaire contributors to the various Super PACS which will only fuel the vitriol of this presidential election cycle.  The list of contributors, those who have given a million or more and to which PAC, is available on line.  Robert Smith, the NPR reporter, focused on Steven Lund, who had set up a phony corporation to hide the fact that he had given  $1 million to  Restore our Future, the Super PAC supporting Mitt Romney.   I could have easily slipped into cynicism, believing that Citizens United (2010) was indeed the death knell of our democracy.  I could have slipped deeper into despair thinking that the U.S. Supreme Court might overturn Citizens United, but not before the Super PACS had done their damage and gotten Obama out of office.  At first I tried to elicit Stephen Colbert’s satire, his Super PAC, Making a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow.  But even Stephen’s wicked humor didn’t help.   That’s all I could conjure was a scene of depressed and disappointed would-be voters who might just sit out this election.  I was recognizing the symptoms: cynicism, passivity, and victimhood.  These are self-government’s deadly enemies.

That’s when I thought about John Payton, former President and Director-Counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Education  Fund (LDF),  who died too young and quite unexpectedly on March 22, 2012.

John Payton was the keynote speaker at the March 2010 “Vulnerable Populations, Economic Realities” conference organized and hosted by Golden Gate University School of Law and co-sponsored by SALT.  He had been invited to the conference by Golden Gate’s Dean Drucilla Stender Ramey.  After he brought an early morning crowd of law professors to our feet in rousing applause, Dean Ramey persuaded him to contribute his speech as the opening essay to the volume Golden Gate and SALT edited Vulnerable Populations and Transformative Law Teaching: A Critical Reader (Carolina Academic Press 2011).  Two interns who spent the summer 2010 with SALT, Madeline Zuckerman and Brian Elliot, were asked to go through the essay and complete it with citations to authorities.

Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Diversity, Social Justice | Leave a comment

Send Lawyers, Guns and Money: Nashiri Hits the Fan

By Benjamin G. Davis, Associate Professor of Law, University of Toledo College of Law

http://youtu.be/S5puAN1PGQw

Well, I went home with the waitress
The way I always do
How was I to know
She was with the Russians, too

I was gambling in Havana
I took a little risk
Send lawyers, guns and money
Dad, get me out of this

I’m the innocent bystander
Somehow I got stuck
Between the rock and the hard place
And I’m down on my luck
And I’m down on my luck
And I’m down on my luck

Now I’m hiding in Honduras
I’m a desperate man
Send lawyers, guns and money
The sh*t has hit the fan

Send lawyers, guns and money…

(Warren Zevon – Send Lawyers Guns and Money)

At Guantanamo three days of motion hearings have just concluded in  the military commission of the alleged Cole bomber – Mr. Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammad Abdu Al-Nashiri who is facing a potential death penalty.  Over at lawfareblog.com a blog of the exchanges of the lawyers for the government and Mr. Al-Nashiri with the military judge has been provided courtesy of Benjamin Wittes.  Also over at lawfareblog.com today, they posted further information about a civil suit seeking a declaratory judgment filed by Mr. Nashiri last November against the Military Commission Convening Authority for his orders to try Mr. Al-Nashiri capitally.  Along with these gems, there are reports of the Chief Military Prosecutor, and speeches by high-level lawyer types from a recent national security conference at Harvard such as the speech of the current CIA General Counsel. 

 Reading these events has been riveting because it seems so many strands of what has been happening over the past years of the War on Terror are coming together in a most dramatic manner.  I am finding it difficult to clearly express the sense I have of something having been intimated by these events this week.  Yet, my muse is certain that plates are moving and shifting if we are attune to looking for them.  The care and attention being focused on this process by the powers that be also suggest that something very important is afoot. 

As Zevon would say, the sh*t has hit the fan as Mr. Nashiri fights for his life and the US tries to convict him and execute him in this military commission system.  In this death struggle, the different strands of the US approach to these detainees are coming together so that they can be seen in a holistic manner – the detention regime, the intelligence gathering regime, and the prosecution regime.  All occurring across the political backdrop of a heated up Presidential race.

It is very elaborate what is revealed – yet in its elaborateness I sense that all of the actors know that each has his or her role to play and in playing their roles they will assure that the end that is foreshadowed will be the end foretold.

But (as in the quoted song above), let me ASSERT the role of the bystander (however innocent), somehow stuck, between the rock and the hard place, and no doubt down on my luck.  Yes, I am down on my luck.  I am down on my luck because the rock of regularly constituted tribunal, the rock of the torture peremptory norm, the  rock of the minimum international standard of justice is pushing up against the hard place of U.S. national security imperatives, the hard place of the federal separate powers’ will to crush a foreigner it despises, and the hard place that has called us back to dark nights of the American soul – this time in a rainbow coalition.

But, in being that bystander, I am fortunate that I had the chance to read Judge James Robertson’s opinion denying a stay of the Hamdan military commission back in 2008.  Judge James Robertson in dicta raised significant warnings about the Military Commission process. He noted that the “eyes of the world are on Guantánamo Bay” in denying the preliminary injunction.  And while all are asked by powers that be to be reassured that the Military Commissions in place now (2009 version) are “new and improved” compared to those Judge James Robertson discussed (2006 version), it is striking that Judge Robertson’s warnings track almost exactly with what are the subjects of these motions.

Yes I am down on my luck.   Yes I am down on my luck.  Yes I am down on my luck.  Would that I had not read Judge Robertson and could watch these developments without his forewarning.  But I can not.

Would that I could sit quietly by and watch the wheels spin Mr. Al-Nashiri toward oblivion because he is a foreigner and must obviously be guilty.  But I can not.

Would that I could think like former President Bush and those who support these modern commissions that the process that Mr. Al-Nashiri is given is much better than the process that led to all those soldiers being killed and wounded on the Cole so it is good enough.  But I can not.  No I can not.

 Hey stop children, what’s that sound?  Everybody look what’s going down.

 

 

Posted in Unspecified | Leave a comment

Judicial Restraint and the Health Care Litigation

Guest blog by Professor Craig L. Jackson, Thurgood Marshall School of Law, Texas Southern University

Crosspost from Jurist  http://www.jurist.org/forum/2012/04/craig-jackson-judicial-review.php

Did I miss something? Joe Scarborough begins my Tuesday morning with a rant and rave about President Obama’s statement yesterday regarding judicial restraint and the Supreme Court litigation over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. It was apparently egged on by an editorial in Tuesday’s edition in the Wall Street Journal. What the president said was: “[f]or years what we’ve heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint — that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well, this is a good example. And I’m pretty confident that this court will recognize that and not take that step.” Continue reading

Posted in Unspecified | Leave a comment

Investor Activism and the Prison Industrial Complex

In January 2012, the United Methodist Church took a stand against private profits generated from imprisoning American citizens. The UMC board of trustees that oversee the investment of company employees in the churches’ pension fund voted to discontinue any investment in companies that generate or derive profit from the management and operation of prison facilities. Recognizing the perverse incentives attendant in profiting from mass incarceration, the United Methodist Church decided to “vote with its feet (or $$)” by moving its money.

According to the UMC website and author Heather Hahn: “Private prison companies are big business. But, is it moral for United Methodists to make a profit from the incarceration of people? The United Methodist Church’s pension agency has pondered that question since May [2011]. The Board of Pension and Health Benefits announced Jan. 3 [, 2012] its decision to prohibit investments in companies that derive more than 10 percent of their revenue from the management and operation of prison facilities. Continue reading

Posted in Unspecified | Leave a comment

A Comment on Prof. Richard Sander’s Mismatch Theory: Lack of Equality of Result should not disparage seeking Equality of Opportunity

 

By Benjamin G. Davis, Associate Professor of Law, University of Toledo College of Law

Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, I was struck by a comment on a posting of Professor Richard Sander of UCLA Law School about “The Problem of “Science Mismatch”" discussing his ongoing Mismatch Effect work encouraging cascading blacks down to lower ranked schools.  The comment was on what benefit comes from this research and replied,

“The obvious benefit is that we would stop discriminating against Asians and whites, and those blacks that were admitted would not have the rest of the world assuming that they only attended Harvard/Yale/Stanford because of racial preferences.”

That some in the world or the world assumes the worst about any black would not appear to me to be the key point.  That people do research and that we are to get information from that research is also not the key point.  The key point would appear to be to enhance the preparation of students from whatever backgrounds so that all students are better prepared students at each level and all students are given access to the best quality of education so that they can maximize their pursuit of happiness and participation in society.

Continue reading

Posted in Diversity, Unspecified | Leave a comment

what is a hoodie?

by Anthony Paul Farley

what is a hoodie?

hooded sweatshirts are very warm.  i am almost always freezing.  in fact, i’ve been cold ever since my childhood trek from jamaica to tanzania to puerto rico to libya to upstate, ny, america’s cold northeast shoulder, roundabout age seven.  i have a lot of sweatshirts.  the current one says, “obama 2012,” the early ones, from the 70′s, 80′s and 90′s, say, “brockport high school,” “university of virginia” or “harvard.”  all of this leads to my question:

is a hooded sweatshirt the same as a “hoodie?”

Continue reading

Posted in Unspecified | 1 Comment